Skip to main content

Full text of "Distribution of time-constants for tunneling through a 1D Disordered Chain"

See other formats


Distribution of time-constants for tunneling through a ID Disordered Chain 






I 



cd 



I 

o 



> 

in 

en 
en 
(N 

O 
On 
0^ 
-(— • 



o 
o 



X 



C.J. Bolton-Hcaton*, C.J. Lambert*, Vladimir I. Falko*, V. Prigodin^ and A.J. Epstein f 
Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LAI 4^B, UK 
' Physics Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 4.3210-1106, USA 

(February 7, 2008) 

The dynamics of electronic tunneling through a disordered ID chain of finite length is considered. 
We calculate distributions of the transmission coefficient T, Wigner delay time and, r^ and the 
transport time, Tt = Tt^. The central bodies of these distributions have a power- law form, what 
can be understood in terms of the resonant tunneling through localised states. 



05.45+b, 03.65Nk, 24.30-v 

During the past decade, transport properties of 
phase-coherent disordered low-dimensional conductors 
attracted much interest. The transmission properties 
of complex structures with a large number of internal 
degrees of freedom have been intensively studied using 
random matrix theory ||l|, and a universal distribution 
for transmission coefficients through metallic systems has 
been derived . The one-dimensional localization prob- 
lem is exactly solvable, and a complete description of the 
distribution of transmission coefficients, T and localiza- 
tion properties of single-electron wave functions in disor- 
dered ID and quasi-lD wires is now available |^,|l^. In 
particular, it has been found that the inverse localization 
radius, a of single-particle localized states by disorder in 
a ID chain has a normal distribution with width inversely 
proportional to the chain length, L: 



P{a) ^ exp < — L 



[a- aoY^ 



2ao 



(1) 



Here, Uq is the most probable localization radius which 
for a weakly disordered system is given by Uq ~ 41, 
where I is the mean free path. This is equivalent to a 
log-normal distribution of the transmission coefficients, 
T ^ exp(— aL), 



P{T) ~ ^ exp . 



(ln(l/T) - 2Laof 
8Laa 



(2) 



Recently, random matrix theory was applied to the 
problem of the dynamical electric response of mesoscopic 
conductors and disordered wires in the localized regime. 
Here the problem involves understanding the distribution 
of the Wigner delay time, r^ which carries information 
about the life-time of carriers in the resonant states re- 
sponsible for transmission through a weakly couple quan- 
tum dot, or through a disordered wire in the localized 
regime. The Wigner delay time is related to the en- 
ergy dependence of the phase shift 9(e) of a wave passing 
through a disordered wire or a quantum resonator, and 
is given by 



T4, 



d0{e) _ 1 d ^^ GRie,L) 
de 2ide ^GA{e,L)' 



(3) 



This equation also expresses the delay time in terms of 
retarded and advanced Green functions, Gr^a{^iL) = 
X^i/ i^l{^)^v{L)/ [e — El- ± «0], which links r^ to the den- 
sity of states of a system, r^ = tt J„ dxi>{e,x). The 
Wigner delay time in zero-dimensional mesoscopic sys- 
tems modelled using random matrix theory has been 
studied B within the zero-dimensional cr-model ap- 
proach, and has been shown to have a universal distribu- 
tion. In the present paper, we analyze a related dynami- 
cal characteristic of a disordered conductor, namely, the 
transport time Tt defined as the delay time weighted by 
the transmission coefficient. 



Tt = Tta, 



(4) 



This quantity characterizes the ability of a resonant 
state to provide a dynamical response to an external 
ac-electric field. Using the Landauer-Buttiker approach, 
the imaginary part of the dimensionless ac-conductance 
g — G{uj)/'^^ of a single-channel mesoscopic wire pT| , p^ , 

g = T{u) = vlGnie + l^/2, L)GA{e - c^/2, L), 



can be represented as 



Imgiuj) = nm[l — ilot^ + ...] 



-WTt, 



SO that the transport time, Tt is a directly measurable 
quantity, which can be also interpreted as the dielectric 
response function of an almost insulating ID wire, when 
ReG — > 0. In the present paper, we report the results of 
numerical studies and a qualitative asymptotic analysis 
of the transport-time distribution function Pijt) in the 
localized regime of ID disordered wires. To anticipate 
a little, we find that the distribution of this quantity is 
affected by correlations between the value of the Wigner 
delay time and the transmission coefficient of resonances 
via localized states. Using information about the distri- 
bution of the localization radia in Eq. (^ and about the 
energetic widths of individual resonances, we show that 
the central body of the distribution of Tt, which corre- 
sponds to —2/3 < (1/z) ln(rt/r) < 1/3, where z = Lao, 
is given by the power-law asymptotic. 



Pin) 



T-'e' 



zl2 I ^ 
Tt 



4/3 



(5) 



in complete agreement with our numerical simulations. 
The tail of short times n, (1/z) ln(Tt/r) < —2/3 decays 
in the logarithmically normal way, 



, , , ,„ /Tt\-(3/2) + (l/(8z))ln(r/n) 

whereas for (1/z) ln(Tf/T) > 1/3, 

l+{l/{2z))ln(rt/T) 



P(n)^r-ie-/^(^y 



(6) 



(7) 



Below, we show how Eqs. (|^{7|) can be obtained. And 
describe the numerical procedure used to determine the 
distribution of r^ and Tt . We begin with an analysis of the 
Wigner delay time and introduce the numerically-studied 
model. In agreement with the result of Ref. ||^, we show, 
both analytically and numerically, that the body of the 
distribution function P{tii,) is dominated by the inverse- 
square-law asymptotic 



P(t0) ^t/tI, at T0 > T, 



(8) 



where r is the mean free path time. These results pro- 
vide a check both of both the analytical method and 
the numerics and are followed by an the analysis of the 
transport-time distribution, which is the central goal of 
this paper. 

To obtain the distribution of r^, we note that in the ab- 
sence of disorder in a ID wire, T = 1 and t^ = Tt ~ L/vp, 
vp being the electron Fermi velocity which determines 
the ballistic time of flight of an electron through the 
chain. For a weakly disordered chain characterized by 
a mean free path I = vt or scattering time r <C 1/e, 
the transmission T, r^ and Tt are random variables. In 
a long wire L ':§> I, where localization is strong, trans- 
mission can be viewed as being the result of tunneling 
through resonant levels, each characterized by its energy, 
eo and decay width, 7 = 71 -I- 72 determined by the elec- 
tron escape rates 71.2 into the left and right contacts. In 
the exponential localization regime L ^ I, the tunnelling 
rates associated with a resonant state peaked at a; < L 
(calculated from the left end of the chain) are of order 



7i=T-ie-2"i- 



and 72 = T t 



-2a2{L-x) 



(9) 



where ai and a2 are two independently fluctuating in- 
verse localization radia of the wave function tail on the 
left and right hand sides of the resonance. Note that 
since the resonance width falls exponentially with the 
wire length, whereas the mean level spacing A = l/vL 
is only inverse proportional to L, the assumption L ^ I 
allows us to distinguish between resonances and to con- 
sider each resonant state as a slightly broadened discrete 
level. 

Therefore, at each value of the energy, the ac- 
transmission through the disordered ID chain can be de- 
scribed using the Bright- Wigner formula, 



T{e) 



47172 



(e^eor+j^ 



parametrized by four independently fluctuating parame- 
ters: the energetic position cq of the resonance which is 
closest to the energy e, the location of the center of mass 
of the resonant state, x and two inverse localization ra- 
dia, ai and a2. The associated Wigner delay time can 
be represented as 



1 



1 



7 1 + [(e - eo)/7] 

To analyze the distribution function P{t^), we assume 
that the center of the localized state and its energy have 
a homogeneous distribution, and that the probability to 
find some value of the inverse localization radius ai in 
a segment of a wire with the length Xi { xi = x and 
X2 — L — x) is equal to 



P{a,) 



27ra( 



■ exp 



2a, 



■{ai 



aa 



(10) 



It is convenient to use random variables p = 
{aixi +a2X2)/z and q = {a\X\ —a2X2)lz, instead of 
ai and a2, where z — Lao = L/Al, which can be de- 
scribed using the joint distribution function 



Pip,q) 



1 



27ryr 



: exp 



(p-l? 



(g - yp)'^ 
(1 - y') 



(11) 



where y = {x/ L) — 2 is uniformly distributed within the 
interval [—1,1]. In the same parametrization, one can 
represent the Wigner delay time as 



T0 



exp(0p) 



1 + (e/7)^ cosh(zg) ' 



and the corresponding probability density as the condi- 
tional probability integral 



nr^) = r 




dpdqPip,q) (12) 

1 exp(zp) ^ T0 \ 

{e/-ff cosh{zq) T J ■ 



To analyze Eq. (O) , we evaluate the integral using the 
saddle-point method, and for t^ < re^ find that 



Pir^,) 



(13) 



Note that the length of the chain does not appear in this 
result, which indicates that this intermediate asymptotic 
of the delay-time distribution, which is related to the dis- 
tribution of the spectral width of the resonant states, is 
dominated by the electron escape-rate from the resonant 



state into the nearest reservoir and for L ^ cxd is exact 
for any delay time. However, the finite length L deter- 
mines a cut-off, T0 ^ re^ for this universal behavior, and 
for T^ > T exp(z) we find 



P(r4>) 



exp(-^/2) /rV"-^'/^''"'"^^*^^^ 



T0 



in agreement with Melnikov p|. 

To illustrate the validity of the above estimates, we 
compute the scattering matrix of a series of equal 
strength, randomly spaced delta- function scatterers. The 
spacings between scatterers possesses a Poisson distribu- 
tion, and the system is described by the Hamiltonian 






(14) 



In the region Xj^i < x < Xj, an eigenstate of energy e 
is of the form 

V'e(2:) = Aj-e*''^ -I- Bj-e"*''^, Xj-i < X < Xj 



where k = \/2me/h and the wave amplitudes on either 
side of the scatterer j satisfy 



A,+i 



i+i _ 



Bj+i 



T, 



A, 
B, 



In this expression T, is the transfer matrix. 



T, 



1 - iP -iPe-^'^'-"^ 



(15) 



(16) 



where (3 = mfj,/h k. 

The transfer matrix for a series of A^ scatterers has the 
form, 



T = 



T21 f, 



22 



(17) 



and is given by the product of the transfer matrices of 
each individual scatterer 

T = TnTn^i • • -Ti, 

from which one obtains the scattering matrix 

r t' 



S = 



t r' 



via the relation 



T[ rrf — 1 rr\ — 1 

21J22 J22 

T* — 1 rji rrt — 1 

11 J12J22 



(18) 



(19) 



For a chain of length L the conductance and the inverse 
localization radius are determined by 



g — |tp and a{L) 



ln\t\^ 



As an example of Eq. (Q), and to emphasize that we 
are simulating a chain of weak scatterers for which a^ 
is greater than the mean spacing, Fig. 1 shows P{a) 
for a chain of scatterers of concentration unity, strength 
Uq = i and energy e = A.lir^. These same parameter 
values were used in all numerical simulations described 
below. 

Fig. 2 shows the corresponding plot of In P{t^)t^ 
for the chain lengths L = 50, 70, 100, 200. These re- 
sults were obtained by evaluating a finite difference 
T0 — {9{e + S) — 9{e)) /S, and were found to be sta- 
ble with respect to any choice of d within the range 
10^^ < S < 10"^. For Inr > all curves exhibit a 
plateau with a slope that tends to zero with increasing 
length, in a good agreement with the analytically esti- 
mated asymptotic behavior in Eq. (g). 

Having obtained agreement with known results for 
P{a) and P{tij,), we now present an analysis of the trans- 
port time distribution, P{Tt), which represents the cen- 
tral new result of this paper. Using the resonant tun- 
neling description of Section II, the transport time for a 
particle with a given energy e is given by 



Tt = Tts = 



471727' 



{l + [{e-e„)hfy 



(20) 



This allows us to parametrize the transport time using 
the position x of the resonant state center and two (left 
and right) inverse localization radia, ai_2 as in Section 
H, 



At 



Tt 



exp(zp) 



i + (e/7r 



cosh (zq) 



The probability to find a given value of Tt can again be 
expressed as a conditional probability 

P{Tt)^T-'J dy J dpdqPip,q) (21) 

4 exp(zp) Tt 




+ (e/7)1 ^o'^h (^'^) 



and evaluation of the integral in Eq. (K^) using 
the saddle-point method yields the result of Eqs.(H- 
M). Note that the power-law asymptotic P{Tt) ^ 

T~^e~^" \-^\ , valid for the finite length wires within 

the parametric interval —2/3 < (1/z) ln(Tt/r) < 1/3, for- 
mally transforms into the universal central body of the 
distribution in the thermodynamic limit i — > 00. 

To illustrate the validity of this result. Fig. 3 shows 
plots of the function \wP{Tt)T^ versus In Tt for various 



lengths. These numerical simulations show that at large 
Tt all curves exhibit a plateau with a slope that tends to 
zero with increasing length, demonstrating that the tail 
in the distribution of Tt , varies as t^ ' . 

In summary, we have shown how earlier results for the 
Wigner-delay time r^, based on a picture of resonant 
transport through localized states, can be extended to 
yield the distribution of the transport time Tt = Tt^. In 
contrast with the distribution of r^, which exhibits a uni- 
versal I/t? tail, the corresponding intermediate asymp- 
totic of the distribution of Tt exhibits a universal 1/tj 
behavior. 






0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 

a 



FIG. 1. Distribution P{a) versus a for a chain length of 
200 



[1] B.L. Altshuler and B.D. Simons, in Mesoscopic Quantum 

Physics, edited by E. Akkermans, G. Montabaux, J.-L. 

Pichard, and J. Zinn- Justin (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 

1996). 
[2] M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices and Statistical Theory of 

Energy Levels (Academic, New York, 1991). 
[3] R. A. Jalabert, A. D. Stone, and Y. Alhassid, Phys. Rev. 

Lett. 68, 3468 (1992). 
[4] Ya.V. Fyodorov and H-J. Sommers, Phys. Rev. Lett, 76 

4709 (1996) 
[5] P. W. Anderson, D. J. Thouless, E. Abrahams, and D. 

S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3519 (1980). 
[6] V.I. Melnikov, Sov. Phys. Solid State 23, 444 (1981) [Fiz. 

Tverd. Tela 23, 782 (1981)]. 
[7] R. Landauer and Th. Martin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 217 

(1994). 
[8] V. Gasparian and M. Pollak, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2038 

(1993). 
[9] C. Texier and A. Comtet, |cond-mat 9812196i Dec (1998) 
[10] C.W.J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 731 (1997) 
[11] H. M. Pastawski, Phys. Rev. B 46, 4053 (1992). 
[12] M. Blittiker, A. Pretre, and H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 

70, 4114 (1993). 
[13] V.A. Gospar, P.A. Mello and M. Biittiker Rev. Lett. 77, 

3005 (1996). 
[14] R.S. Kohlman, J. Joo, Y.G. Min, A.G. MacDiarmid, and 

A.J. Epstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2766 (1996). 



w 9- 



Q. 

c 



■ length=50 

■ length=70 

• length=100 
length=200 



InXip 

FIG. 2. Plots of lnP{T^)T^ versus Inr, for various lengths, 
, ranging from L = 50 (upper curve) to L = 200 (lower curve. 
The size of the ensemble is 10* 








^______ .^ 




1M 


"'■ N 


-,— ,. 


!D 




./"A ■ 


" / 




/. 


,„„..„, — v^,^_^.: - 




/ 


^ ■ tength=50 

>— . Ien9th=70 
— -. Iength=100 
»--• length=200 



-20.0 

nxt 



FIG. 3. Plots of lnP(rt)rj' versus Inrt, for various 
lengths, ranging from L = 50 (upper curve) to L = 200 (lower 
curve. The insert shows the central portions of the distribu- 
tions. The size of the ensemble is 10*